PCV supports gear-based maps and you can also add an Autotune module (even dual channel) that employs wideband o2 sensors that will actively adjust the fueling on the fly to the AFR set in the unit. AFRs can be loaded for each and every cell on the map for extremely specific tuning. You want to build an economy map? You can. Want a performance map? Sure. Want to plug in your laptop and see what all that money you spent is actually doing? No problem. Add a new exhaust or air filter? You can tune for that.
Your "modern ecu" uses narrowband sensors to comply with emissions in closed loop only. You can datalog with the POD300 and convert all that data into useful graphs with their PowerCore software. One can also find info about everything on the PCV. There's a reason Power Commanders are used all over the world with great success.
Coober (the self-proclaimed non-tuning company) sells you an ECU that plugs into your bike that improves performance. Very vague on details, make claims that go against common established knowledge on engines and get huffy when asked to explain how they came to those claims. I'm not asking for a full breakdown and keys to their Patented product, but they don't make me feel comfortable the way they conduct themselves. They've been using fear-based marketing to coax people into thinking they are the only solution. I'm sure their "engineering product" does a good job of "not tuning" the bike, but I need a little more confidence in a company than they provide. How do we know their ECU doesn't use one flat map? How do we know adding a decat will detonate an engine? Just take their word and a few scary blown engine pics of unknown origin? Eh, I've said it before, I'm fully open to Coober explaining themselves better but I can't find anything solid to go off of. I guess I'm just the customer that they don't like. One that asks questions. Crazy concept I suppose.
